| Journal of General Virology |
| SUMMARY | INTRO | METHODS | RESULTS | DISCUSSION | FOOTNOTES | REFS |
| First posted online 19 July 2000 | FULL-LENGTH ARTICLE |
| Rec 23 February 2000; Acc 7 July 2000 | DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.16995-0 |
[Retraction published in JGV 82, part 11, 2837]
Atsushi Handa and Kevin E. Brown
Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung and
Blood Institute, Bldg 10/Rm 7C218, National Institutes of Health, 9000
Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892-1652, USA
A novel flavivirus, GB virus C (GBV-C)/hepatitis G virus (HGV), has been detected in chronic liver disease patients. It is known that the viral RNA can be detected in ~5 % of American blood donors. However, the implications for liver disease and the sites of virus replication remain unknown. Possible sites of virus replication were studied by using cell lines and/or primary cells derived from human lymphoid cells, myeloid cells, hepatocytes and endothelial cells. RNA was detected by virus strand-specific RTPCR and GBV-C/HGV antigen was detected with a rabbit polyclonal anti-E2 (envelope 2) antibody by Western blot analysis. Negative-strand RNA, representative of replicating virus, was detected in lymphoid and megakaryocytoid cell lines and primary vascular endothelial cells. In addition, an increase in virus titre over time was demonstrated and viral antigen was detected, and virus could be passaged to infect fresh cells. However, viral RNA or antigen could not be detected in any of the hepatocyte lines tested. These results indicate that the replication site of GBV-C/HGV is not primarily in hepatocytes and that detection of replicating virus in hepatic tissue may reflect virus replication in haematopoietic cells and/or vascular endothelial cells present in the liver.
Introduction |
GB virus C (GBV-C) and hepatitis G virus (HGV) were
recently identified and proposed as possible aetiological agents of non-A,
non-B, non-C hepatitis (Simons et al., 1995
; Linnen et al., 1996
). The two viruses share 85 % nucleotide and 95 % amino
acid sequence identity and are considered to be different isolates of the
same virus (Leary et al., 1996
). GBV-C/HGV is a positive-stranded RNA virus, closely
related to hepatitis C virus (HCV), and a member of the
Flaviviridae. Viraemia can be detected in ~5 % of American blood
donors (Gutierrez et al., 1997
) and, like HCV, the virus was thought originally to be
transmitted primarily by parenteral routes (Khudyakov et al.,
1997
; Seipp et al., 1996
). However, we have previously shown that
viraemia is detectable in 67 % of non-transfused American children
(Handa et al., 2000
) and other studies have
been unable to confirm an increased risk with parenteral exposure
(Cantaloube et al., 1999
), suggesting that non-parenteral transmission is important
(Feucht et al., 1999
; Menendez et al.,
1999
).
The role of GBV-C/HGV as a hepatitis virus also
remains controversial (Mushahwar & Zuckerman, 1998
): the evidence for a role in seronegative
hepatitis has been reported as either negligible or weak (Wang et
al., 1998
) and, although several initial
reports suggested an association between GBV-C/HGV viraemia and fulminant
hepatitis (Yoshiba et al., 1995
; Heringlake et al., 1996
), others have not confirmed this (Tameda et al.,
1996
; Kanda et al., 1997
). Similarly, although some groups have claimed
that this virus is hepatotropic and have shown its replication in human
liver (Seipp et al., 1999
; Madejon et al., 1997
), there are several reports suggesting that human liver is
not a primary site of replication (Pessoa et al., 1998
; Laras et al., 1999
).
Members of the family Flaviviridae, which
includes yellow fever virus, HCV and dengue viruses, utilize the synthesis
of replicative RNA, a negative-strand RNA complementary to the genomic
RNA, as a template for virus replication (Laskus et al., 1997
; Lindenbach & Rice, 1997
). We therefore developed a strand-specific
RTPCR assay that could distinguish positive- and negative-strand RNA
and used this to look for GBV-C/HGV replicative RNA in a variety of
different cell lines inoculated with virus. In addition, we looked for
evidence of viral antigen production by using a rabbit polyclonal antibody
against a viral envelope protein.
Methods |
Virus and cells. Plasma from a patient known
to be viraemic for GBV-C/HGV was used as a source of virus: there was no
evidence of co-infection with HCV, hepatitis B virus or human
immunodeficiency virus (Brown et al., 1997
).
Haematopoietic cell lines CESS, Jurkat, C5/MJ, ARH-77 (lymphocytic leukaemia cell lines), HL-60, K562, U937, KG1a, HEL and Meg-01 (myelocytic leukaemia cell lines) and hepatocyte-derived cell lines Chang liver, SK-HEP-1 and PLC/PRF/5 were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured as recommended. UT-7/Epo cells (a megakaryoblastoid cell line, a gift from Dr Komatsu, Jichi Medical School, Tochigi, Japan) were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10 % foetal calf serum (FCS) and erythropoietin (2 U/ml). Primary human lymphocytes were derived from a normal healthy donor and were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10 % FCS and IL-2 (500 IU/ml). Primary human hepatocytes were purchased from Clonetics (San Diego, CA, USA) and cultured in hepatocyte maintenance medium (Clonetics). Primary vascular endothelial cells were purchased from Cell Systems (Kirkland, WA, USA) and grown in CS-C medium (Cell Systems).
Generation of synthetic GBV-C RNA templates.
GBV-C/HGV RNA was extracted from viraemic plasma and cDNA was prepared as
described previously (Brown et al., 1997
). Full-length E2 was amplified by PCR and cloned into
pcDNAFlag, a derivative of the pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen) modified to
include a Flag tag (Take et al., 2000
). PCR amplification was performed with primers GBO and
GBOR from the conserved 5´ non-coding region of the GBV-C genome
(Ikeda et al., 1997
). The product was cloned
directly into the TA-cloning vector pCR2.1-TOPO (TOPO TA cloning kit,
Invitrogen), which has a T7 promoter sequence upstream of the cloning
site. Orientation of the GBV-C/HGV sequence was confirmed by sequencing
and plasmids capable of producing either sense or antisense transcripts
were selected. The GBV-C/HGV DNA templates were linearized with
HindIII and were transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase (Life
Technologies) for 30 min at 37 °C, producing positive and negative
GBV-C/HGV RNA strands. Residual plasmid DNA was removed by digestion with
DNase I (amplification grade from Life Technologies; 15 min at room
temperature) followed by inactivation of DNase I (65 °C for 10 min).
Removal of residual DNA was confirmed by PCR amplification. RNA
concentrations were measured by spectrophotometry and RNA template copy
numbers were calculated.
Strand-specific RTPCR. Total RNA was
extracted from CESS cells by using STAT-60 total RNA/mRNA isolation
reagent (Tel-Test Inc., Friendswood, TX, USA) with 10 µl tRNA (10
mg/ml) as a carrier. Serial dilutions of RNA templates were prepared in a
solution of cellular RNA and preheated to 70 °C for 10 min in order
to reduce RNA secondary structure and to maximize the stringency of the
cDNA synthesis. cDNA was synthesized by using 50 pmol of the
strand-specific primers GBO (for detection of negative strand; Ikeda et
al., 1997
) or GBOR (positive strand) in a 25
µl RT mixture following the RNA PCR Core kit protocol (Perkin-Elmer).
Reverse transcriptase was inactivated by heating the samples for 5 min at
99 °C prior to nested PCR. Amplification was performed (2.5 µl
template) for 30 cycles (94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min and 72
°C for 2 min) followed by a final extension step at 72 °C for 7
min with primers GBO and GBOR, followed by second-round amplification
under the same conditions (5 µl of the PCR product) with specific
internal primers GB and GBIR (Ikeda et al., 1997
). The final amplicons (207 bp) were analysed by
agarose gel electrophoresis.
Inoculation of cells with GBV-C/HGV. The same serum used as a source of GBV-C/HGV RNA was used as the source of infectious virus. Cells (106 cells/ml) were aliquotted into 24-well tissue culture plates and incubated with the GBV-C/HGV-positive serum (10 µl, equivalent to 106 genome copies) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5 % CO2 (day 0). The cells were maintained in culture for up to 2 months with a half-volume change of medium every 3 days. Cell numbers were estimated and harvested cells and supernatant were stored for the extraction of RNA, Western blotting and immunofluorescence assays.
Total RNA was extracted from cells
(2x105) by using STAT-60 total RNA/mRNA isolation reagent
(Tel-Test) with 10 µl tRNA (10 mg/ml) as a carrier. Positive- and
negative-strand GBV-C/HGV RNA was amplified by using the strand-specific
RTPCR described above. Titres of positive- and negative-strand
GBV-C/HGV RNA were calculated by performing strand-specific PCR on serial
dilutions of samples that tested positive. In addition, all the PCR
products were confirmed by TA cloning (TOPO TA cloning, Invitrogen) and
sequencing of the products. To confirm the extraction of RNA, RTPCR
for
-actin was performed as described previously (Hanazono et
al., 1999
) and PCR was performed in the
absence of reverse transcription to check for DNA contamination.
Expression of E2 protein and production of rabbit
polyclonal antibodies. The complete GBV-C/HGV E2 envelope coding
region was cloned into a mammalian expression vector (Fig.
1), expressed in COS-7 cells as a Flag-fusion protein (Handa et
al., 2000
) and purified by using an anti-Flag
affinity gel (Eastman Kodak). The purified E2 fusion protein (molecular
mass 47 kDa; 300 µg) was inoculated into a rabbit. The rabbit immune
response was boosted five times (days 14, 28, 42, 56 and 70) with further
E2 fusion protein inoculations. The rabbit was exsanguinated at day 85 and
the serum was used as polyclonal antibody to E2 fusion protein. Anti-E2
reactivity was confirmed by testing the serum in a commercial anti-E2
antibody detection kit (µPLATE Anti-HGenv, Boehringer Mannheim) with
HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Biosource International) instead of
the attached anti-human-Fc
antibody.
Fig. 1. Plasmid map of the expression vector
used to produce the FlagE2 fusion protein. The vector was
transfected into COS-7 cells and cells were harvested 3 days later. The
E2Flag fusion protein was purified by using anti-Flag affinity
columns (Anti-Flag M2 affinity gel; Eastman Kodak) and inoculated into two
rabbits. Sera were screened for reactivity to the inoculated protein and
serum from one of the rabbits (day 85) was used as a source of anti-E2
antibody.
Western blotting of cell cultures for E2 protein. Every 3 days, half of the cells were harvested and 2x105 cells were denatured in SDS lysis buffer and the proteins were separated by SDSPAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Non-specific binding was blocked by incubation in Blotto (5 % milk powder in PBS with 0.05 % Tween 20) for 2 h at room temperature prior to incubation with rabbit polyclonal antibody (diluted 1:100 in PBS plus 0.05 % Tween 20, 1 % milk powder) for 2 h. The membranes were washed and incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (diluted 1:10000; Biosource International) for 2 h at room temperature and bands were detected by chemiluminescence (SuperSignal Substrate, Western blotting, Pierce). The specificity of the bands was confirmed by testing with rabbit serum obtained prior to E2 inoculation and its size was calculated from standard mass markers on the Western blot.
Indirect fluorescence assay of cell cultures for E2 protein. Cells (5x104) were cytocentrifuged (Shandon; 800 r.p.m. for 2 min) onto glass slides and fixed in acetonemethanol (1:1) for 10 min at 4 °C. After air drying, the slides were incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:100) for 1 h at 37 °C, washed twice with PBS and incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (diluted 1:100; Biosource International) for 1 h at 37 °C. After a further wash, FITC-positive cells were detected by fluorescence microscopy.
Results |
Development of a strand-specific RTPCR assay
The specificity and sensitivity of the strand-specific RTPCR assay were determined by testing serial dilutions of positive- and negative-strand templates in a fixed amount of cellular RNA. Both assays had similar sensitivities, with a limit of detection at <104 copies per PCR (Fig. 2). In addition, the assays were strand specific, with 108 copies of the negative- or positive-strand template RNA not amplified without the corresponding primers (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. Sensitivity and specificity of
strand-specific RTPCR. Synthetic negative- and positive-strand RNA
templates were produced by T7 RNA polymerase and serial dilutions were
prepared in total cellular RNA (from 2x105 CESS cells) and
tested by strand-specific RTPCR assay. After electrophoresis, the
bands were visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Specificity was
confirmed by testing with or without the reverse transcription step.
(a) Positive-strand-specific PCR; (b)
negative-strand-specific PCR. Controls were water (negative) and DNA
template (positive).
Detection of negative-strand RNA and E2 antigen in haematopoietic cells
When the plasma from a GBV-C/HGV-viraemic patient used for inoculation was tested in the strand-specific RTPCR assay, only positive-strand GBV-C RNA could be detected (Fig. 3), with a titre of 109 copies/ml. After 24 h, positive-strand RNA only was demonstrated in CESS cells, primary lymphocytes, HL-60, U937, HEL and Meg-01 cultures, presumably from the original inoculum (Table 1). From day 3 post-infection, both positive- and negative-strand GBV-C/HGV RNA were detected in some cell cultures, in some cases for up to 30 days (lymphoid cells, CESS and megakaryocytoid cells, Meg-01; Table 1, Fig. 3). The virus titres in harvested cells and supernatant were determined by semiquantitative RTPCR and the increase in virus titre was calculated. In both the CESS and Meg-01 cell lines, there was a 1 log increase in the virus titre in the supernatant and >2 log increase in the cell pellet compared with input virus (106 genome copies inoculated) by day 3 (Table 2), not accounting for the dilution resulting from subculturing the cells twice weekly. In addition, >106 copies of negative-strand RNA were detected in the cultures.
Table 1. Expression of GBV-C/HGV RNA (positive and negative strands) and virus antigen in haematopoietic cells
Cells were infected with GBV-C/HGV-containing serum (106 genome copies; day 0) and harvested at different time-points post-inoculation and strand-specific RTPCR and Western blotting for E2 antigen were performed. Results are given as (1)/(2)/(3): (1) positive-strand RNA, (2) negative-strand RNA, (3) E2 antigen detected by Western blot. Detection is scored as: +, >104 copies per reaction or detection of E2 antigen; , <104 copies per reaction or E2 antigen not detected. NT, Not tested.
|
Time post-inoculation (days) |
||||||
|
Cell line |
1 |
3 |
9 |
21 |
30 |
60 |
|
Lymphoid |
||||||
|
CESS |
+/-/- |
+/+/+ |
+/+/+ |
+/+/+ |
+/+/+ |
-/-/- |
|
Jurkat |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
|
C5/MJ |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
NT |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
|
ARH-77 |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
NT |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
|
Primary lymphocytes |
+/-/- |
+/-/- |
NT |
+/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
|
Myeloid |
||||||
|
HL-60 |
+/-/- |
+/-/- |
NT |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
|
K562 |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
|
U937 |
+/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
|
KG1a |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
|
HEL |
+/-/- |
+/-/- |
+/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
|
Meg-01 |
+/-/- |
+/+/+ |
+/+/+ |
+/+/+ |
+/+/+ |
-/-/- |
|
UT-7/Epo |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
NT |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
In contrast, negative-strand RNA was not detected in the other lymphoid cell lines tested (Jurkat, C5/MJ and ARH-77) and the myeloid cell lines were all uniformly negative (HL-60, K562, U937, KG1a, HEL and UT-7/Epo). After 40 days of culture, no viral RNA could be detected in any of the cultures, despite over 90 % cell viability as estimated by trypan blue dye exclusion.
All of the cell cultures were also tested for the presence of GBV-C/HGV antigen. No E2 protein was detected on day 0, but E2 protein could be detected thereafter in all the cell cultures that had detectable negative strand RNA (Table1, Fig. 4), but not in cell cultures that were only positive for positive-strand RNA. These data supported the observation that detection of positive strand represented inoculated virus only.
Cell cultures that were positive for E2 antigen by Western blot (CESS, Meg-01 and primary vascular endothelial cells) were also tested by indirect immunofluorescence. In Meg-01 cells at 3 days post-infection, specific immunofluorescence could be detected, restricted to the cytoplasm (Fig. 5). Viral antigens could not be detected in the other cells by indirect immunofluorescence.
Fig. 3. Negative-strand-specific RTPCR of
cell cultures. Cells were infected with GBV-C/HGV-containing serum and
harvested at different time-points post-inoculation. RNA was extracted,
cDNA was synthesized by using the negative-strand-specific primer (GBO),
nested PCR was performed and the products were visualized in ethidium
bromide-stained agarose gels. The PCR product has a predicted size of 207
bp.
Passage of GBV-C/HGV infectivity to fresh cells
In order to confirm the production of infectious virus in CESS and Meg-01 cells, the day 9 supernatant was collected, the GBV-C/HGV titre was calculated and 100 µl was reinoculated into fresh cells. For both cell lines, the day 9 supernatant contained 106 GBV-C/HGV copies/ml; negative strand could not be detected (<105 copies/ml). Total samples (cells and supernatant together) were harvested at day 3 and semiquantitative strand-specific RTPCR was performed. In both cell lines, there was a 3 log increase in positive-strand titre compared with input virus (108 copies per culture compared with 105 input virus) and 106 copies of negative-strand GBV-C/HGV RNA were detected.
Table 2. Semiquantitative strand-specific RTPCR for GBV-C/HGV RNA
A semiquantitative strand-specific RTPCR was used to detect GBV-C/HGV RNA in supernatant or cells of GBV-C/HGV-sensitive cells (CESS, Meg-01 and primary endothelial cells). Serum (10 µl, 106 genome copies) was inoculated into cell cultures (day 0). Cells and supernatant were harvested every 3 days, cell numbers were estimated and RTPCR was performed. Titres indicate the number of RNA copies/ml culture. Results are shown as (1)/(2): (1) positive-strand RNA, (2) negative-strand RNA. , <106 copies per ml culture. NT, Not tested.
|
Time post-inoculation (days) (dilution since inoculation) |
|||||
|
Cell line |
1 (x1) |
3 (x2) |
9 (x8) |
21 (x128) |
30 (x1024) |
|
Supernatant |
|||||
|
CESS |
/ |
107/ |
106/ |
NT |
/ |
|
Meg-01 |
/ |
107/ |
106/ |
106/ |
/ |
|
Primary endothelial cells |
/ |
107/ |
NT |
106/ |
/ |
|
Cells |
|||||
|
CESS |
106/ |
8x108/106 |
4x107/106 |
4x107/106 |
106/106 |
|
Meg-01 |
106/ |
6x108/107 |
8x108/106 |
7x107/106 |
107/106 |
|
Primary endothelial cells |
106/ |
109/106 |
NT |
109/107 |
108/106 |
Detection of negative-strand RNA and E2 antigen in hepatocytes and endothelial cells
Primary hepatocyte cultures and cell lines were also tested for evidence of GBV-C replication by strand-specific RTPCR. As with some of the haematopoietic cell lines, positive-strand RNA could be detected in primary hepatocytes, PLC/PRF/5 and primary vascular endothelial cells after 24 h inoculation (Table 3). However, we were unable to detect negative-strand RNA in any of the hepatocyte cultures or cell lines. In contrast, we could detect both positive- and negative-strand RNA in primary vascular endothelial cells for 30 days post-inoculation (Table 3). The virus titre in primary vascular endothelial cells was determined by semiquantitative RTPCR (Table 2). Compared with the input virus (106 genome copies), 107 copies of the positive strand were detected in the supernatant by day 3 and 109 copies of positive strand and 106 copies of negative strand were detected in the cell pellets. In addition, E2 viral antigen could also be directed over this time-period (Fig. 4). As with the haematopoietic cultures, no negative-strand RNA or E2 protein could be detected after 40 days of culture, despite the presence of viable cells (Table 3).
Discussion |
Despite the identification of GBV-C/HGV in 1995,
there is no efficient way of growing the virus in culture and little is
known about its pathogenesis, including its site of replication in the
body. However, viraemia is not uncommon among healthy adults (Gutierrez
et al., 1997
) and even in children
(Handa et al., 2000
) and we hypothesized
that haematopoietic blood cells or vascular endothelial cells were good
candidates for virus replication sites. To identify the replication site
of GBV-C/HGV, we have developed assays to detect negative-strand or
replicative RNA transcripts in cells and expressed E2 protein as a fusion
protein in order to produce a polyclonal rabbit antiserum capable of
detecting viral antigens.
Fig. 4. Western blot analysis of E2 antigen in
infected cell preparations. GBV-C/HGV-inoculated cells (+) or controls
() were harvested at several time-points post-inoculation, cells were
lysed and proteins were separated by SDSPAGE. After transfer to
nitrocellulose membranes, Western blot was performed with a rabbit anti-E2
polyclonal antibody, anti-rabbit HRP conjugate and chemiluminescence
detection. The E2 protein has a predicted size of 47 kDa. *, Positive
control using COS-7 cells transfected (+) or not transfected () with
the FlagE2 expression vector.
Using these reagents and assays, we were able to detect negative-strand RNA, indicative of replicative RNA, for up to 30 days in some tissue cultures (Meg-01, CESS and primary vascular endothelial cells). In addition, we could demonstrate a significant increase in positive-strand RNA titre in these cell lines and virus could be passaged into fresh cells. We could also detect viral antigens in the cells by Western blotting, although, perhaps due to the relative lack of sensitivity, we could only detect antigens by immunofluorescence in Meg-01 cells. Together, these results indicate that active virus replication was occurring in these cell lines.
GBV-C/HGV is known to be transmitted readily by
blood transfusion (Tsuda et al., 1996
; Wang et al., 1996
) and viral RNA has been detected in peripheral blood
mononuclear cells (Sheng et al., 1997
; Fogeda et al., 1999
). In addition, several reports have detected GBV-C/HGV
negative-strand RNA associated with peripheral blood mononuclear cells,
suggesting that haematopoietic cells may be one of the sites of GBV-C
replication (Laskus et al., 1997
; Fogeda et al., 1999
; Cabrerizo et al., 1999
). However, other studies have not been able to confirm
these findings (Mellor et al., 1998
; Laskus et al., 1998
; Kao et al., 1999
), although these studies concluded that the possibility of
very low levels of GBV-C replication in mononuclear cells could not be
excluded. In our study, we could detect both negative-strand RNA and E2
antigen in one T cell line (CESS) for 30 days after virus inoculation,
although we could detect only the positive-strand RNA from primary
lymphocytes, perhaps suggesting that GBV-C infects only a sub-population
of lymphocytes.
Some of the discrepancy between the different
studies may be due to differences in the inoculum used as a source of
virus. Patients with GBV-C/HGV are often also infected with HCV (Sheng
et al., 1997
; Schleicher et
al., 1996
) and, in several studies, serum
that was co-infected with HCV has been used as a source of GBV-C/HGV.
Alternatively, the cell lines chosen for study may have been co-infected with
HCV: MT-2C (human T-cell line), interferon-resistant Daudi cells
(Burkitt's lymphoma cell line) and PH5CH (hepatocyte cell line) cells were
used to study GBV-C/HGV (Ikeda et al., 1997
; Shimizu et al., 1999
).
Fig. 5. Indirect immunofluorescence assay of E2
antigen in Meg-01 cells. Cells were cultured with or without GBV-C/HGV
inoculation and harvested 3 days later. Cytocentrifuged preparations were
fixed with methanolacetone and stained with rabbit anti-GBV-C/HGV
antiserum followed by anti-rabbit FITC conjugate and examined by UV
microscopy. (a) Cells inoculated with GBV-C/HGV-positive serum.
(b) Non-inoculated control cells.
GBV-C/HGV was originally detected in patients with
hepatitis (Simons et al., 1995
; Linnen et al., 1996
), and several studies have looked for negative-strand RNA
in hepatocytes or liver samples. As with the lymphocyte data, the results
are controversial, with some groups detecting strand-specific RNA
(Seipp et al., 1999
; Madejon et al.,
1997
) and other groups being
unsuccessful (Fogeda et al., 1999
; Cabrerizo et al., 1999
). However, liver tissue contains not only hepatocytes, but
also connective tissue and blood, and detection of negative-strand RNA in
liver tissue may represent virus in lymphocytes or other cell types,
including vascular endothelial cells.
In our study of both primary hepatocytes and
hepatocyte cell lines, we were unable to detect either GBV-C antigen or
negative-strand RNA. In a similar study to ours, but using different cell
lines, Seipp et al. (1999
) inoculated hepatocyte cell lines with a
GBV-C/HGV-positive, HCV-negative serum and looked for the presence of
negative-strand RNA. They were able to detect positive-strand RNA in 40 %
of hepatocytes but negative-strand RNA in only 1/500 hepatocytes by
fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis. This difference in results may be
due to differences in the sensitivity of the assays: in their study, the
assay had a 10-fold higher sensitivity, detecting 102 copies of
positive strand and 103 copies of negative strand per PCR.
Although they detected negative-strand RNA in four liver samples, three
liver samples were positive only at the limit of sensitivity
(103 copies). Therefore, even these results suggest that the
negative-strand titre was at the limit of detection in hepatocytes and that
liver tissue was not an
efficient site of GBV-C/HGV replication.
Table 3. Expression of GBV-C/HGV RNA (positive and negative strands) and virus antigen in hepatocytes and endothelial cells
Cells were inoculated with GBV-C/HGV-containing serum (106 genome copies; day 0) and harvested at different time-points post-inoculation. Strand-specific RTPCR and Western blotting for E2 antigen were performed. Results are presented as (1)/(2)/(3): (1) positive-strand RNA, (2) negative-strand RNA, (3) E2 antigen detected by Western blot. +, >104 copies per reaction or detection of E2 antigen; , <104 copies per reaction or E2 antigen not detected. NT, Not tested.
|
Time post-inoculation (days) |
||||||
|
Cell line |
1 |
3 |
9 |
21 |
30 |
60 |
|
Primary hepatocytes |
+/-/- |
+/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
NT |
NT |
|
Chang liver cells |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
|
SK-HEP |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
NT |
-/-/- |
|
PLC/PRF |
+/-/- |
+/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
-/-/- |
NT |
|
Primary endothelial cells |
+/-/- |
+/+/+ |
NT |
+/+/+ |
+/+/+ |
-/-/- |
We were also able to detect negative-strand RNA in
primary vascular endothelial cells and, although some reports have
suggested an association of GBV-C/HGV with vasculitis (Tepper et
al., 1998
; Francesconi et al., 1997
), the ability of GBV-C/HGV to infect
endothelial cells has not been reported. However, it was recently
suggested that members of the Flaviviridae, including GBV-C/HGV,
use the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R) as a receptor for virus
entry (Agnello et al., 1999
), and LDL-R is known to be present on vascular endothelial
cells (Sawamura et al., 1997
).
The ability of GBV-C to infect megakaryoblasts was
unexpected. Although the presence of LDL-R on a rat promegakaryoblast cell
line has been described in one report (Budd et al., 1991
), we have been unable to find any studies of
the expression of LDL-R on human megakaryoblasts. HCV infection can be
associated with thrombocytopenia (Hernandez et al., 1998
; Emilia et al., 1997
); however, no reports have indicated an association of
GBV-C with low platelet counts. Thus, the significance of this observation
is unknown and further studies are necessary to determine both the
relationship between GBV-C and megakaryoblast infection and the true
cellular tropism of GBV-C. However, our studies indicate that the virus
can replicate in lymphocytes, megakaryocytes and vascular endothelial
cells.
References |
This article is now available in the October 2000 print issue of JGV (vol. 81, 2461-2469). The complete issue of the journal may be seen in electronic form on JGV Online.