| Journal of General Virology |
| SUMMARY | DISCOVERY | ORIGIN | EPIDEMIOLOGY | PATHOGENESIS | STRUCTURE | TROPISM | INFECTION | CONCLUSION | REFS |
| First posted online 19 March 2002 | REVIEW ARTICLE |
| DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.18253-0 |
Jacqueline D. Reeves and Robert W. Doms
Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania,
301 Johnson Pavilion, 3610 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104,
USA
The AIDS pandemic continues to spread unchecked in many parts of the world, with greater than 34 million individuals currently infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). While most infections are due to HIV type 1 (HIV-1) strains, HIV-2 represents a significant minority of all HIV infections in some countries, such as Guinea-Bissau and Portugal. While similar in many ways, there are important differences between HIV-1 and HIV-2 that provide insights into virus evolution, tropism and pathogenesis. Major differences include reduced pathogenicity of HIV-2 relative to HIV-1, enhanced immune control of HIV-2 infection and often some degree of CD4-independence. This review discusses the origin of HIV-2 and its relationship to simian immunodeficiency virus and HIV-1, its epidemiology, its pathogenic potential and how its Env protein interacts with cell surface receptors to mediate virus infection.
Discovery of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) |
AIDS, resulting from HIV-1 infection, was first recognized in 1981
when a common pattern of symptoms was observed among a small number
of homosexual men in the USA (Brennan & Durack, 1981
; Gottlieb et
al., 1981
). AIDS cases were soon reported in
other groups, including intravenous drug users and haemophiliacs
(CDC, 1982
; Davis et al., 1983
; Masur et al., 1981
). Soon after the
identification of AIDS in humans, outbreaks of wasting and severe
infections were identified in captive colonies of Asian rhesus
macaques in USA primate centres and these symptoms became known as
simian AIDS (Henrickson et al., 1983
; Letvin et
al., 1983
). The sera from these animals showed
cross-reactivity to HIV-1 antigens by Western blot (Kanki et
al., 1985
), which led to the identification of a
related lentivirus, termed simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)
(Daniel et al., 1985
). Surprisingly, sera from Senegalese
sex workers were found to cross-react preferentially with SIV
antigens compared to HIV-1 by Western blot, indicating exposure to
an SIV-like virus (Barin et al., 1985
).
Subsequently, a virus more closely related to SIV than HIV-1
was isolated from West African AIDS patients from Guinea-Bissau and
Cape Verde (Clavel et al., 1986
). This virus, referred to as
lymphadenopathy-associated virus type 2, is now known as HIV-2.
Origin of HIV-2 and relationship to HIV-1 |
HIV-2, along with HIV-1 and SIV, comprise the subgenus
'primate lentiviruses'. The genomic organization of
these viruses is similar, although HIV-1 and SIV of chimpanzees
(SIVcpz) encode a vpu gene, while HIV-2 and SIV
of sooty mangabeys (SIVsm) have a vpx gene. The
function of Vpx is not clear, although it may play a role in
nuclear import (Fletcher et al., 1996
) and the
functions normally associated with HIV-1 Vpr may be provided
separately in HIV-2 by Vpr (cell cycle arrest in G2) and
Vpx (nuclear import) in HIV-2. Vpx (but not Vpr) is important for
efficient replication of HIV-2 in PBMCs but not T cell lines (Park
& Sodroski, 1995
). Additionally,
Vpx
).
Despite similar genomic organizations, there is a high degree of
genetic diversity between the primate lentiviruses, especially in
their env genes. Genetic variability between HIV-2 strains
is comparable to that within HIV-1 groups, with up to 25 %
divergence in Gag, Pol and Env (Gao et al., 1994
; Schulz et
al., 1990
; Zagury et al., 1988
).
HIV is thought to have originated from zoonotic transmissions from
SIV-infected non-human primates (Gao et al., 1992
, 1999
; Hirsch et
al., 1989
). SIVs from chimpanzees cluster
phylogenetically with HIV-1 (Fig. 1) (Gao et al., 1999
); hence, the
HIV-1 epidemic is likely to have originated from SIVcpz.
In contrast, all criteria identifying HIV-2 as a zoonosis from the
sooty mangabey (Cercocebus atys) are met: i.e. similarity in
genomic organization; phylogenetic relatedness (Fig. 1); prevalence in the natural host; geographical
overlap; and plausible route of transmission (Sharp et al.,
1995
).
From phylogenetic analysis of divergent HIV-2 strains, it appears
that there have been seven independent transmissions from sooty
mangabeys to humans, resulting in HIV-2 subtypes AG (Chen
et al., 1997a
; Gao et al., 1994
; Yamaguchi et
al., 2000
). Only one member each of subtypes C,
E, F and G, and two members of subtype D, have been identified
(reviewed by Schim van der Loeff & Aaby, 1999
) and it is
thought that these rare subtypes may be primary zoonotic
infections.
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationship of primate lentiviruses. Alignment of pol gene sequences of HIV-1, HIV-2 and SIV strain SIVmm; SIV of sooty mangabeys or macaques experimentally infected with SIVmm. Reproduced from Human Retroviruses and AIDS (Los Alamos, New Mexico; Theoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory) (Kuiken et al., 1999
), with permission.
Epidemiology, transmission and treatment |
Epidemiology
The epicentre of HIV-1 infection is East Africa. In contrast, HIV-2
is restricted primarily to West Africa, although the prevalence of
HIV-2 is a growing concern in certain parts of Europe and in the
southwestern region of India. In Guinea-Bissau, a former Portuguese
colony, there is an HIV-2 prevalence of up to 810 % (Poulsen
et al., 1989
; Wilkins et al., 1993
). A lower
prevalence of 12 % is found in surrounding countries,
including The Gambia, Senegal and Guinea, although the prevalence
among commercial sex workers in The Gambia is as high as 28 % (Ghys
et al., 1997
; Langley et al., 1996
). In addition to
West Africa, countries with past socio-economical links with
Portugal, including southwest India (Babu et al., 1993
; Kulkarni et
al., 1992
; Rubsamen-Waigmann et al.,
1991
),
Angola, Mozambique and Brazil, have significant numbers of HIV-2
infections (reviewed by Schim van der Loeff & Aaby, 1999
). Portugal has
the highest prevalence of HIV-2 infection in Europe, accounting for
around 1013 % of total HIV infections and 4.5 % of AIDS
cases (Soriano et al., 2000
; UNAIDS/WHO, 1998
).
Subtype A accounts for the majority of HIV-2 infections and is the
predominant genotype in Guinea-Bissau and Europe (Norrgren et
al., 1997
; Schim van der Loeff & Aaby, 1999
). The prototype
HIV-2 strain, ROD, is a subtype A virus that was isolated from a Cape
Verdian (Clavel et al., 1986
). Subtype B viruses seem to have originated
from the eastern parts of West Africa (Ghana and the Ivory Coast)
and have occasionally been isolated in Europe (reviewed by Schim
van der Loeff & Aaby, 1999
). Sierra Leone has a low prevalence of
HIV-2, around 0.02 %, but the highest diversity of HIV-2 subtypes
(A, B, E and F), probably resulting from zoonoses from local sooty
mangabeys infected with diverse strains of SIVsm (Chen
et al., 1996
, 1997a
; Gao et al., 1994
).
Instances of dual infection (HIV-1+/HIV-2+)
are occurring more frequently in HIV-2 endemic regions, such as
Guinea-Bissau, due to the rising prevalence of HIV-1 infection in
these areas (Andersson et al., 1999
; Ishikawa et
al., 1998
), raising the possibility that
recombination events between HIV-1 and HIV-2 will occur. The
epidemiology of HIV-2 is detailed further in a review by Schim van der Loeff
& Aaby (1999
).
Transmission
Due to differences in transmission rates and virulence, HIV-1 is
pandemic, with rising prevalence rates in developing countries,
while HIV-2 is more endemic, with stable prevalence rates in most
countries (Remy, 1998
). The transmission of HIV-2 compared to HIV-1
is detailed elsewhere (Schim van der Loeff & Aaby, 1999
). Briefly, HIV-2
appears to be transmitted by the same routes as HIV-1; however, the
frequency of transmission is reduced, probably due to a very low
virus load in many asymptomatic individuals (Adjorlolo-Johnson
et al., 1994
; Berry et al., 1998
; Cavaco-Silva
et al., 1998
; Kanki et al., 1994
; O'Donovan
et al., 2000
). For instance, sexual and vertical
transmissions of HIV-2 are around 5- to 9-fold and 10- to 20-fold
reduced relative to HIV-1, respectively.
Treatment of infection
HIV-2-infected individuals in Europe have been treated
with anti-retroviral agents (Smith et al., 2001
; Soriano et
al., 2000
; van der Ende, 2000
; van der Ende et
al., 2000
) but there are no reports of
large-scale clinical trials involving HIV-2-infected cohorts. As
for HIV-1, the use of single anti-retroviral agents, or suboptimal
combination therapy, can lead to the development of drug-resistance
mutations in vivo (Rodes et al., 2000
; Smith et
al., 2001
; van der Ende et al., 2000
). Additionally,
many HIV-2 strains naturally have amino acids that confer drug
resistance and may thus decrease the therapeutic potential of some
anti-retroviral agents (Isaka et al., 2001
; van der Ende,
2000
). However, others are active against HIV-2 (Clark et
al., 1998
; Witvrouw et al., 1999
) and, with the
correct drug combination, the reduced virus load and virulence of
HIV-2 may make highly active anti-retroviral therapy extremely
effective (Smith et al., 2001
; Whittle et al., 1998
). The
distribution of anti-retroviral drugs within developing countries
and the development of an inexpensive vaccine remain priorities.
Pathogenesis and immune response |
Naturally infected sooty mangabeys, African green monkeys and
chimpanzees do not develop SIV-related disease, even though high
virus loads can sometimes be detected in their plasma (Desrosiers,
1990
; Rey-Cuille et al., 1998
). Disease is only associated with
cross-species transmission of the viruses; i.e. from sooty
mangabeys into humans (HIV-2) and rhesus macaques
(SIVmac) or from chimpanzees into humans (HIV-1). The
clinical features of HIV-2 infection are similar to those of HIV-1 infection (Brun-Vezinet et al., 1987
); however, HIV-2
is generally less pathogenic. This may be due to differences in
virulence, the lower plasma virus load that is usually associated
with HIV-2 infection or better immune control of HIV-2 replication
compared to HIV-1 (Andersson et al., 2000
; Berry et
al., 1998
; Simon et al., 1993
; Soriano et
al., 2000
; Whittle et al., 1998
). HIV-2-infected
individuals usually have a long clinically latent period of 10
years or more, resulting in a mortality rate estimated to be
two-thirds lower than that for HIV-1 (Marlink et al., 1994
; Pepin et
al., 1991
; Whittle et al., 1994
). Indeed, many
HIV-2-infected individuals appear not to progress to AIDS at all
(Poulsen et al., 1997
). When infection does progress,
however, virus load and rate of progression are fairly comparable
between HIV-1 and HIV-2 (Berry et al., 1998
; Simon et
al., 1993
; Whittle et al., 1992
). Interestingly,
the burden of proviral DNA is similar in HIV-1 and HIV-2
infections, hence the lower virus load typically observed in
HIV-2-infected individuals may be accounted for by differences in
virus production (Popper et al., 2000
).
It has been reported that HIV-2 infection can prevent/protect
('immunize') against subsequent HIV-1 infection both
in vitro (Arya & Gallo, 1996
; Browning et al., 1999
; Dern et
al., 2001
; Kokkotou et al., 2000
; Rappaport et
al., 1995
) and in vivo (Greenberg et
al., 1996
; Travers et al., 1995
, 1998
); however, these
in vivo findings have proved controversial (Aaby et
al., 1997
; Ariyoshi et al., 1997
; Norrgren et
al., 1999
; Wiktor et al., 1999
). Sera from
HIV-2-infected individuals are often better at neutralizing
autologous as well as heterologous virus in comparison to
HIV-1+ sera and some HIV-2 antisera can cross-neutralize
HIV-1 strains (Bjorling et al., 1993
; Fenyo &
Putkonen, 1996
; Robert-Guroff et al., 1992
; Weiss et
al., 1988
). Additionally, HIV-2-infected
individuals often have a strong cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)
response to HIV-2, which can frequently cross-react with HIV-1 strains
(Bertoletti et al., 1998
; Gotch et al., 1993
; Rowland-Jones
et al., 1995
). CTL responses to HIV-2 infection are
reviewed further by Whittle et al. (1998
).
The overproduction of
chemokines by PBMCs from HIV-2-infected
donors can prevent infection of R5 tropic (see below) HIV-1 strains
in vitro (Kokkotou et al., 2000
). Furthermore,
HIV-2 (but not HIV-1) Env protein can interact with CD8 on T cells
that are non-permissive to infection, triggering the production of
chemokines (Akimoto et al., 1998
; Ichiyama et al., 1999
). Higher
proportions of CD8+ T cells from HIV-2-infected individuals retain
the ability to simultaneously produce the cytokines IL-2 and IFN-
.
Likewise, more CD4+ T cells are capable of producing IL-2 than those
from HIV-1-infected individuals with equivalent CD4+ T cell counts
(Sousa et al., 2001
). These factors may also account in
part for the better immune control of HIV-2 infection compared to
that of HIV-1 infection. It is also interesting to note that
deletions within the nef gene of HIV-2 are quite common
(Switzer et al., 1998
), while nef deletions are found
infrequently in HIV-1, where they significantly reduce replication
in vitro and in vivo (Piguet & Trono, 1999
). Nef
downregulates surface expression of MHC class I molecules (Kerkau
et al., 1997
; Le Gall et al., 1998
), thus a
functional Nef protein may aid evasion of host immune responses.
The clinical manifestations of HIV-2 AIDS are similar to those for
HIV-1 and only minor differences in pathology resulting from HIV-2,
compared to HIV-1, infection have been observed. For example, in
the Ivory Coast, encephalitis was shown at autopsy to be almost
restricted to individuals with HIV-2-related causes of death (18 %;
n=40), compared to HIV-1 (<1 %; n=170) (Lucas
et al., 1993
). Whether this is because people
infected with HIV-2 generally survive longer than those infected
with HIV-1 or if HIV-2 is more neurotropic/neuropathogenic than
HIV-1 is unknown. Additionally, AIDS-associated Kaposi's
sarcoma occurs in around 10 % of HIV-1-infected individuals (Safai,
1997
),
although it is less frequent in HIV-1-infected Gambians and
approximately 12-fold less frequent still in HIV-2-infected
Gambians (Ariyoshi et al., 1998
).
Envelope structure and function |
The env genes of HIV-1 and HIV-2 encode the precursor 160
and 140 kDa glycoproteins (gp160/gp140, respectively). These
precursors are cleaved by a host protease into the HIV-1 120 kDa
and HIV-2 125 kDa surface (SU) glycoproteins (gp120/gp125) and the
41 and 36 kDa transmembrane (TM) glycoproteins (gp41/gp36) for
HIV-1 and HIV-2, respectively (Freed et al., 1989
; McCune et
al., 1988
). SU and TM form
glycoprotein 'spikes' in the virus membrane that
consist of trimers of non-covalently linked SU and TM proteins
(Center et al., 2001
; Chan et al., 1997
; Lu et
al., 1995
; Weissenhorn et al., 1997
). As for HIV-1,
the SU protein of HIV-2 contains five variable (V1V5) and
five conserved domains (C1C5), numerous N-linked
glycosylation sites and conserved disulphide bonds
(Modrow et al., 1987
; Starcich et al., 1986
; Willey et
al., 1986
). In addition, residues in HIV-1 gp120
implicated in CD4 or coreceptor binding are highly conserved in SIV
and HIV-2 (Kwong et al., 1998
; Rizzuto et al., 1998
), indicating
that these proteins likely share similar structures. HIV and
SIV TM proteins consist of an N-terminal extracellular domain,
containing a fusion peptide and two
-helical regions, a
membrane-spanning domain and a C-terminal intracellular domain with
an endocytosis/basolateral targeting signal and two amphipathic
regions. Structural studies indicate that the HIV-1 and SIV TM
proteins are highly similar (Blacklow et al., 1995
; Chan et
al., 1997
; Lu et al., 1995
; Weissenhorn
et al., 1997
; Yang et al., 1999
), making it
likely that the HIV-2 TM subunit closely resembles these proteins.
Interaction with CD4
The Env proteins of HIV are primarily involved in binding and
entry. SU proteins interact with cellular receptors to attach virus
particles to the cell surface and to induce conformational changes
in both the SU and TM proteins, which enable triggering of the
fusion process. As for HIV-1, CD4 is the primary receptor for all
HIV-2 strains. However, a number of HIV-2 isolates have been
described that can infect cells independently of CD4 (see below) (Reeves et al., 1999
). For most
HIV-1 strains, the EnvCD4 interaction is of high
affinity, with dissociation constants occurring in the nM range;
for example, around 34 nM for the HIV-1 IIIB strain (Lasky et
al., 1987
; Moore, 1990
). The interaction of HIV-2 and SIV Env
proteins with CD4 may be of somewhat lower affinity, although
relatively few virus strains have been examined carefully
(Ivey-Hoyle et al., 1991
; Layne et al., 1990
; Moore, 1990
). For example, the
dissociation constant of HIV-2ROD/A SU protein to CD4
is approximately 45 nM, while that for the
SIVmac SU protein is around 350 nM (Ivey-Hoyle et
al., 1991
; Moore, 1990
).
Interaction with coreceptors
CD4 binding induces conformational changes in the SU subunit of Env
that enable it to bind a coreceptor. In the case of HIV-1, CD4
binding induces the formation and/or exposure of a highly conserved
domain in the bridging sheet region of the SU protein that has been
shown to be important for coreceptor binding (Fig. 2)
(Rizzuto et al., 1998
). Many residues in this region are conserved
between HIV-1, HIV-2 and SIV strains. Thus, it is likely that CD4
binding induces similar conformational changes in HIV-2 Env. As for
HIV-1, all HIV-2 strains use either CCR5 and/or CXCR4 as major
coreceptors for entry into CD4+ cells (Bron et
al., 1997
; Deng et al., 1997
; Hill et
al., 1997
; Pleskoff et al., 1997a
, b
; Rucker et
al., 1997
; Sol et al., 1997
). Amino acids in
the V3 loop of Env can determine X4 or R5 tropism for both HIV-1
and HIV-2 strains (Choe et al., 1996
; Cocchi et
al., 1996
; Isaka et al., 1999
; Speck et
al., 1997
). Many HIV-2 strains can, however, use
a wider range of coreceptors compared to HIV-1 and may use these as
efficiently as CCR5 or CXCR4 (Guillon et al., 1998
; McKnight et
al., 1998
; Owen et al., 1998
; Reeves et
al., 1999
; Unutmaz et al., 1998
). Additionally,
some HIV-2 strains can utilize coreceptors that are not, or are
rarely, used by HIV-1 strains, including CCR1 (Guillon et
al., 1998
; McKnight et al., 1998
; Owen et
al., 1998
), CCR4 (McKnight et al., 1998
; Owen et
al., 1998
) and GPR1 (Liu et al., 2000
; Shimizu et
al., 1999
). Other coreceptors used by HIV-2
strains include CCR2b (Guillon et al., 1998
; McKnight et
al., 1998
; Owen et al., 1998
), CCR3 (Bron
et al., 1997
; Reeves et al., 1997
; Sol et
al., 1997
), CCR8 (Rucker et al., 1997
; Simmons et
al., 2000
), CXCR5 (Kanbe et al., 1999
),
CX3CR1 (Reeves et al., 1997
; Rucker et
al., 1997
), GPR15 (Deng et al., 1997
; Owen et
al., 1998
), STRL33 (Deng et al., 1997
; Owen et
al., 1998
), RDC1 (Shimizu et al., 2000
), APJ (Liu et
al., 2000
) and US28 (Pleskoff et al.,
1997b
).
Thus, HIV-2 strains are, in general, more promiscuous that HIV-1
strains in their use of coreceptors. However, it is not clear if
use of receptors other than CCR5 or CXCR4 is relevant in
vivo. Some alternative coreceptors are not expressed on
CD4+ cells or are expressed at levels below that needed
to support virus infection (Sharron et al., 2000
). Nonetheless,
in contrast to HIV-1, some HIV-2 and SIV strains are able to infect PBMCs independently
of either CCR5 or CXCR4 (Chen et al., 1997b
, 1998
; Simmons
et al., 2000
; Sol et al., 1997
; Zhang et
al., 2000
) implicating a potential role of at
least some alternative receptor(s) for infection in vivo.
Additionally, HIV-2 infection may result in higher levels of
chemokine production compared to HIV-1 infection (Akimoto et
al., 1998
; Kokkotou et al., 2000
) and may thus
drive evolution of alternative receptor use.
Coreceptor domains that are involved in mediating HIV-2 infection are similar to those required for HIV-1. For example, the N terminus and second extracellular loop of CXCR4 are important in mediating fusion and infection of HIV-2 ROD (Brelot et al., 1997
; Potempa et al., 1997
; Reeves et al., 1998
).
Fig. 2. Predicted coreceptor-binding site on HIV-2 gp120. Space-filling model of HIV-2 gp120 core indicating potential residues involved in coreceptor interactions and the location of the V1/V2 and V3 loop stems. This structure was predicted by SWISSPROT, based upon existing HIV-1 gp120 core crystals (pdb accession codes 1GC1, 1G9N and 1GM9) and rendered with RASMOL, version 2.7.1.
Virus tropism and coreceptor use in vivo |
While all HIV-1, HIV-2 and SIV isolates infect primary
CD4+ T cells, isolates can differ in their relative
tropism for macrophages and human T cells lines, as well as in their
replication rates, and were thus historically divided into three
groups. The first group consists of viruses that infect
CD4+ T cell lines in vitro, induce syncytia
(multinucleated giant cells) and replicate to high titres
relatively quickly and are termed syncytium-inducing, T cell tropic
or rapid/high viruses. The use of CXCR4 (X4 tropism) is characteristic of these viruses. The second group consists of those
that infect macrophage cultures efficiently, do not induce syncytia
in infected primary T cells and replicate slowly to relatively low
titres and are thus referred to as macrophage tropic,
non-syncytium-inducing or slow/low viruses. These viruses typically
use CCR5 as their major coreceptor and are referred to as R5
tropic. The third group can infect both T cell lines and
macrophages and are thus referred to as dual-tropic viruses. These
viruses typically use both CXCR4 and CCR5 and are termed R5/X4.
Thus, virus tropism is largely explained by coreceptor usage,
although a host of other factors, including receptor density,
conformation and post-entry events, can also influence virus
infection. Additionally, primary syncytium-inducing isolates can
infect macrophages via CXCR4 (Simmons et al., 1998
).
For HIV-1, the importance of CCR5 for virus infection was shown by
the discovery that individuals who lack CCR5 are highly resistant
to virus infection (Liu et al., 1996
; Samson et
al., 1996
). R5 virus strains are predominantly
transmitted, are the major virus population in asymptomatic
individuals and usually remain present throughout the course of
infection (Connor et al., 1997
; de Roda Husman et al., 1999
; Huang et
al., 1996
; Li et al., 1999
; van't
Wout et al., 1998
). R5X4 viruses may precede the
evolution to X4 tropism, which occurs in less than 50 % of AIDS
patients (Connor et al., 1997
; Tersmette et al., 1988
). An evolution
from R5 to X4 is not obvious in HIV-2-infected individuals as many
primary isolates use a range of coreceptors including both CCR5 and
CXCR4 and only a limited number of X4 viruses have been isolated
from symptomatic patients (Guillon et al., 1998
; Morner et
al., 1999
; Reeves et al., 1999
). In addition,
it is not known if R5 HIV-2 strains are largely responsible for
virus transmission, as only a few isolates from asymptomatic
individuals predominantly use CCR5 (Guillon et al., 1998
; Owen et
al., 1998
).
CD4-independent virus infection |
One of the most striking differences between HIV-1 and
HIV-2 strains is that, while HIV-1 infection usually requires both
CD4 and a coreceptor, many primary HIV-2 isolates exhibit some
degree of CD4-independence (Reeves et al., 1999
). Even some HIV-2 strains that typically
require CD4 to infect cells can be induced to infect
CD4
; Reeves et al., 1999
). In addition, CD4-independent HIV-2
variants can arise spontaneously in vitro from chronically
infected T cell lines (Clapham et al., 1992
; Endres et
al., 1996
). These viruses primarily use CXCR4 for
infection of CD4
; Lin et
al., 2001
; Reeves et al., 1997
, 2000
; Simmons et
al., 2000
). SIV strains that can use CCR5, GPR15
or STRL33 for CD4-independent infection have also been identified
(Edinger et al., 1997
, 1999
; Reeves et al., 1999
, 2000
; Schenten et
al., 1999
), while only a few CD4-independent
HIV-1 strains that were selected in vitro have been
described (Dumonceaux et al., 1998
; Kolchinsky
et al., 1999
; LaBranche et al., 1999
).
The Env determinants responsible for the CD4-independence of two
HIV-2 strains (ROD/B and vcp) have been analysed in detail (Lin
et al., 2001
; Reeves & Schulz, 1997
). Only two mutations were required to
confer a minimal CD4-independent phenotype to ROD/B, a variant of
the prototypic CD4-dependent HIV-2 ROD/A strain, and a further two
mutations conferred efficient CD4-independent infection (Reeves
& Schulz, 1997
). These same mutations increase the
fusogenicity of the envelope protein as well as increasing the
sensitivity of the envelope to undergo conformational changes
induced by sCD4. The CD4-independence of the HIV-1 IIIB variant 8x
is mediated by mutations in similar regions of envelope as those
found in ROD/B (LaBranche et al., 1999
), although the
CD4-independence of other viruses is conferred by different regions
of env (Dumonceaux et al., 1998
; Kolchinsky
et al., 1999
). It is therefore apparent that
CD4-independence can be acquired by multiple mechanisms and that
only a few amino acid changes are needed to confer
CD4-independence.
The fact that HIV-2 and SIV strains more readily infect
CD4 cells compared to HIV-1 strains may
indicate that their coreceptor-binding site is at least partially
exposed in the absence of CD4, enabling direct contact with a
coreceptor (Fig. 3). CD4 binding by these strains is
likely to modify the 7TM-binding site to increase the affinity of
the Env7TM interaction or to contribute extra energy to
trigger fusion of virus and cell membranes. Either or both of these
roles would provide HIV-2 with the capacity to exploit coreceptors
that otherwise do not interact with gp120 strongly enough to
trigger fusion. Indeed, CD4-independent HIV-2 strains that can use
both CCR5 and CXCR4 to infect CD4+ cells are only able
to use one of these receptors in the absence of CD4, indicating
that the use of CD4 enables a wider range of 7TM receptors to be
exploited for infection (Reeves et al., 1999
).
Fig. 3. CD4-dependent and CD4-independent infection. For CD4-dependent infection, gp120 first interacts with CD4 at the cell surface. This interaction induces conformational changes in Env that allow a secondary interaction with a 7TM coreceptor to occur. Following coreceptor binding, further conformational changes result in fusion of viral and cellular membranes. CD4-independent viruses can bypass CD4 and interact directly with a coreceptor molecule to initiate fusion. The ability to infect cells in the absence of CD4 is associated with HIV-2 and SIV strains and correlates with exposed coreceptor binding sites, broadened cell tropism and enhanced sensitivity to neutralization.
Implications for pathogenesis
While CD4+ haematopoietic cells are the major
targets of HIV in vivo, infection of
CD4 cells has been reported in a minority of
HIV-1-positive individuals. However, the frequencies of infection
of many CD4 cell types in vivo are
unknown and there are no reports of HIV-2 tropism for
CD4 cells in vivo. Nonetheless,
CD4-independent viruses have the potential to infect a broader
range of cell types in vivo. In vitro studies,
coupled with the fact that viruses with distinct sequences and
phenotypes can become compartmentalized in different tissues within
an individual, such as the brain, lymphoid tissue and lungs
(Epstein et al., 1991
; Itescu et al., 1994
; Sankale et
al., 1996
), indicate that selection can occur at
different sites in vivo and suggest some possible sites
where CD4-independent viruses may be important. In the brain, for
example, CD4 astrocytes are susceptible to
HIV-1 infection in vivo (Bagasra et al., 1996
; Stoler et
al., 1986
; Ward et al., 1987
; Wiley et
al., 1986
), particularly in paediatric AIDS cases
(Saito et al., 1994
; Tornatore et al., 1994
). Such infection
is usually restrictive, however, with structural gag and
env genes poorly expressed. HIV-2- and SIV-infected
astrocytes have been cultured ex vivo from infected
macaques, indicating that both HIV-2 and SIV can also infect
astrocytes in vivo (Guillemin et al., 1998
). In addition, CD4-independent HIV-2 ROD/B can productively infect astrocytes in vitro via CXCR4 (Reeves et al., 1999
). A
neurovirulent SIV strain can infect CD4 brain capillary endothelial cells (BCECs)
both in vitro and in vivo (Edinger et al.,
1997
;
Mankowski et al., 1994
) and HIV-1 infection of BCECs has also
been observed in vitro via CCR5 and in vivo (Bagasra et
al., 1996
; Moses et al., 1993
; Ward et
al., 1987
; Wiley et al., 1986
). Therefore,
both HIV-2 and SIV strains have the potential to infect
CD4-independently in vivo via an interaction with CCR5 or
CXCR4.
Implications for vaccine design and therapy
HIV Env contains highly variable regions that may present antigenic
decoys to the immune system. In addition, it is heavily
glycosylated and attempts to generate broadly cross-reactive
neutralizing antibodies have been largely unsuccessful. With the
identification of the receptors used by HIV to infect cells coupled
with structural studies, conserved, functionally important regions
in Env have been identified that could be targets for neutralizing
antibodies. Env proteins that elicit antibodies to conserved
epitopes, such as the coreceptor-binding domain, may prove to be
better vaccine candidates. CD4-independent virus strains can differ
from CD4-dependent isolates by only a few amino acids, yet are
invariably far more sensitive to neutralizing antibodies and
HIV-positive human serum (Edwards et al., 2001
; Hoffman et
al., 1999
). Therefore, the conformation of Env
glycoproteins that allows a direct interaction with coreceptors may
reveal epitopes to neutralizing antibodies that are usually exposed
only after CD4 binding and thus favourably influence the capacity
of the host to control virus replication. Monoclonal antibodies to
such epitopes do interact preferentially with CD4-independent HIV-1
strains (Edwards et al., 2001
; Hoffman et al., 1999
). The very low
virus load observed during asymptomatic HIV-2 infection may result
partly from better immune control of viruses with
'open' Env proteins, which, in turn, could explain why
many HIV-2-infected individuals often survive significantly longer
than those infected with HIV-1. Indeed, sera from HIV-2-infected
individuals are often broadly cross neutralizing (Bjorling
et al., 1993
; Robert-Guroff et al., 1992
; Whittle et
al., 1998
). It will be important to determine if
genetically triggered, CD4-independent Env proteins can
preferentially elicit neutralizing antibodies in addition to being
more susceptible to them.
Implications for virus evolution
The ability of many HIV-2 and SIV strains to infect cells
independently of CD4 suggests that the virus ancestors of HIV and
SIV may have originally used a 7TM receptor alone. Acquisition of a
second receptor, i.e. CD4, may have provided selective advantages
to a virus that persistently replicates in the face of a vigorous
host immune response. On HIV-1 envelopes, the gp120 site for
binding a 7TM receptor is only fully exposed following contact with
CD4 (Figs 2 and 3). This mechanism may enable potential
neutralizing epitopes on or around the 7TM-binding site to be
hidden until the fusion reaction is triggered. Binding to CD4 also
enables a wider range of 7TM receptors to be exploited for
infection (Reeves et al., 1999
) and may assist adaptation or switching
to new coreceptors in vivo. Indeed for HIV-1 strains, CD4
use may aid the evolution from R5 to R5X4 tropism, which seems to
compromise or weaken the interaction of Env with CCR5, as infection
via CCR5 for R5X4 strains is especially sensitive both to CCR5
amino acid substitutions (Bieniasz et al., 1997
; Picard et
al., 1997
) and to inhibition by RANTES (Kledal
et al., 1997
).
Concluding remarks |
HIV-2 provides an interesting contrast to HIV-1. While HIV-1 has spread rapidly throughout the world, HIV-2 has remained more restricted in its distribution, being relatively rare outside of West Africa. For the most part, HIV-2 behaves similarly to HIV-1 in vitro, with its ability to frequently infect cells CD4-independently being a notable exception. Yet, in vivo, HIV-2 is clearly less pathogenic than HIV-1; it is transmitted less efficiently, establishes lower virus loads in asymptomatic infection and results in slower disease progression. HIV-2 therefore provides an important opportunity to study immune control and pathogenesis of lentivirus infections in humans. In effect, HIV-2 appears to be a mildly attenuated form of HIV-1, yet is clearly more pathogenic than SIV in its natural host, the sooty mangabey. Identifying the virus and host factors that account for this are likely to clarify the mechanisms that account for the pathogenic nature of HIV-1 and may help to identify immune factors responsible for the control of HIV-2 infection. This, in turn, could assist in HIV vaccine development. Increased study of primary HIV-2 strains as well as HIV-2-infected individuals will be needed to accomplish these goals.
We would like to thank Paul Clapham and James Hoxie for helpful comments on this manuscript and Mark Biscone for modelling the CCR5-binding site on gp120. Our work is supported by NIH grants AI40880 and AI35383, by a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Translational Research Award and by an Elizabeth Glaser Scientist Award from the Pediatric AIDS Foundation.
References |
Andersson, S., Norrgren, H., da Silva, Z., Biague, A., Bamba, S., Kwok, S., Christopherson, C., Biberfeld, G. & Albert, J. (2000). Plasma viral load in HIV-1 and HIV-2 singly and dually infected individuals in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa: significantly lower plasma virus set point in HIV-2 infection than in HIV-1 infection. Archives of Internal Medicine 160, 32863293.
Brennan, R. O. & Durack, D. T. (1981). Gay compromise syndrome. Lancet 2, 13381339.
de Roda Husman, A. M., van Rij, R. P., Blaak, H., Broersen, S. & Schuitemaker, H. (1999). Adaptation to promiscuous usage of chemokine receptors is not a prerequisite for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 disease progression. Journal of Infectious Diseases 180, 11061115.
Kolchinsky, P., Mirzabekov, T., Farzan, M., Kiprilov, E., Cayabyab, M., Mooney, L. J., Choe, H. & Sodroski, J. (1999). Adaptation of a CCR5-using, primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolate for CD4-independent replication. Journal of Virology 73, 81208126.
Liu, H. Y., Soda, Y., Shimizu, N., Haraguchi, Y., Jinno, A., Takeuchi, Y. & Hoshino, H. (2000). CD4-Dependent and CD4-independent utilization of coreceptors by human immunodeficiency viruses type 2 and simian immunodeficiency viruses. Virology 278, 276288.